Tuesday 23 August 2011

India need to think its strategey to indouse youngster

India's drubbing in the just-
concluded Test series in England
has signalled the urgent need
for youngsters to be blooded
into the Test team, according to
former India captain Anil Kumble. Kumble said that while it could
take time for India to return to
their best, players like Virat
Kohli, Rohit Sharma, Suresh Raina
and Yuvraj Singh needed to be
given an extended run to allow the rebuilding process to take
place. "They have to be given a long
rope," Kumble told AFP. "You may
not see India come back to the
top in quick time. But we have to
ensure that with these
youngsters, we remain in the top three and climb to the top
spot after a few years." Arun Lal, the former India
batsman, echoed Kumble's view.
"You cannot go on with 35 or
38-year-olds till eternity," Lal
said. "We need to infuse new
talent. What happened in England was in a way good. We needed
an awakening." India's 4-0 loss is the their first
whitewash since the three-
match series in Australia in
1999-2000, and the first by a
four-game margin since the
1967-68 tour of Australia. Since Sourav Ganguly took over the
captaincy in 2000, India's
overseas record has shown
marked improvement - India
have won 24 away Tests in the
last 11 years as compared to only four between 1980-99. However, the players responsible
for several of these wins have
already gone - Anil Kumble and
Sourav Ganguly - or are close to
retirement, while the likes of
Virender Sehwag, Zaheer Khan and Harbhajan Singh, who were
part of these wins, have been
dogged by injuries recently. Kapil Dev, another former
captain, said several of these
players would be hard to
replace, making India's task that
much harder. "We were
fortunate to have such good players all at one time, but they
can't go on forever," Dev said. "It
won't be easy to replace them." Former India captain Sunil
Gavaskar said, during
commentary, that while England
were the better side, he had
not expected India to cave in so
meekly. "Losing is part of the game but for a top-ranked side
to lose so badly is inexcusable,"
he said. "England were
magnificent, they were much
superior to India and much
better prepared. But I did expect India to show more fight
than they did in the four Tests." With the Don Argus-led review of
Australian cricket getting a lot
of attention over the last week,
there has been speculation over
whether the BCCI will commission
a similar appraisal in the aftermath of the England series.
Former captain Mansur Ali Khan
Pataudi said he didn't anticipate
too many changes coming into
place. "The BCCI is not going to
show a great deal of vision," Pataudi said. "Cricket will
continue [in India] the way it is,
but I sincerely hope that some
sense does come in." Ravi Shastri, another former
captain, said it was time to look
at different players for the
different formats, with an
emphasis on Test cricket. "It's
time for Indian cricket to identify players who are specifically
suited to the different formats
of the game," Shastri wrote in
the Times of India. "A way has to
be found to encourage those
cricketers who want to give Test cricket priority. There
ought to be superior
remuneration or compensation." var _gaq = _gaq | | [ ] ; _gaq . push( [ ' _setAccount ' , ' UA-25381004-1 ' ] ) ; _gaq . push( [ ' _trackPagev i ew' ] ) ; ( funct i on( ) { var ga = document . createE l ement ( ' scr i p ga . src = ( ' https : ' == document . l ocat i o var s = document . getE l ementsByTagName( } ) ( ) ; < /scr i pt> var _gaq = _gaq | | [ ] ; _gaq . push( [ ' _setAccount ' , ' UA-25381004-1 ' ] ) ; _gaq . push( [ ' _trackPagev i ew' ] ) ; ( funct i on( ) { var ga = document . createE l ement ( ' scr i p ga . src = ( ' https : ' == document . l ocat i o var s = document . getE l ementsByTagName( } ) ( ) ; < /scr i pt>

Sunday 21 August 2011

India are near to a whitewash

India 103 for 5 (Dravid 57*, Dhoni
5*) trail England 591 for 6 dec
(Bell 235, Pietersen 175) by 488
runs The whitewash is well and truly
on. Despite another session being
lost to rain, and the best efforts
of Rahul Dravid, England surged
at The Oval as India were left in
tatters on 103 for 5 in reply to the hosts' massive 591 for 6. Ian
Bell carried his serene maiden
Test double to 235 then, after a
three-hour delay, Virender
Sehwag was removed in the first
over of India's reply and a succession of team-mates,
including Sachin Tendulkar,
followed him with Graeme Swann
making a major impression with
three wickets. England would probably have
carried on their run-glut
towards 650 - or even
consecutive scores of 700,
something that has never been
done - had the weather not closed in at lunch and, despite a
damp outfield, it was a fairly
straightforward decision for
Andrew Strauss to let his
bowlers loose during a long final
session. After a quiet time this is looking like Swann's match with
substantial turn already on offer
out of the footmarks. If he is the
matchwinner it really will be the
complete series for England. Having seen Swann's first ball
turn from RP Singh's
followthrough Tendulkar tried to
counter the threat by sweeping.
It took Swann a little time to
settle, but the sweep proved Tendulkar's downfall when he
gloved a chance over the
wicketkeeper's head and James
Anderson jogged round to hold
the catch. Suresh Raina was given a torrid
time by pace and spin and
couldn't open his account before
being brilliantly stumped by Matt
Prior for a 29-ball duck - the
joint longest by an India batsman - as Swann spun one sharply
past a lunging prod. The foot
was probably on the line, but it
was a brave decision from the
third umpire Steve Davis. To cap
Swann's best day of the series he had nightwatchman Ishant
Sharma caught at short leg two
overs before the close. India's problems were
compounded by Gautam Gambhir
suffering concussion following the
blow he took to the head while
dropping Kevin Pietersen on
Friday which meant India had to shuffle their line-up again.
However, even if Dravid had
remained at No. 3 he wouldn't
have had a long wait. There he
was at the close, defiant on 57,
with another mountain to climb. Sehwag at least avoided a third
golden duck after his king pair
at Edgbaston but didn't go much
further. After two sighters
outside off stump he played a
pair of trademark back-foot drives off Anderson who
responded with a delivery that
nipped back to trap Sehwag lbw
in front of middle and leg. It
meant the sum total of his series
was eight balls, eight runs and three dismissals while, for the
fourth time in the series, India
had lost a wicket in the opening
over. When it comes to changing India's
batting line-up Tendulkar never
shifts so it was VVS Laxman at
No. 3 where he hasn't been
comfortable during this series. He
received an excellent delivery from Stuart Broad that seamed
away to take the outside edge
as England's quicks extracted far
more life from the surface than
India's bowlers managed. And so,
for the seventh innings in a row, there was a standing ovation as
a batsman walked to the middle. Tendulkar didn't settle during his
innings, seemingly always
distracted by problems with the
sightscreen and troubled by the
pace bowlers. He ducked into a
bouncer from Broad (although responded with a flowing on-
drive), offered a return chance
to Tim Bresnan who couldn't hold
on with his left hand and was
very late on another delivery
from Bresnan that wasn't far from being lbw. For once, though,
it was spin not pace that ended
the latest attempt at 100
hundreds. Amid all this Dravid held firm. If
anything, he started his innings
with more positive intent than is
often the case. That meant
positive in defence, too, which
sends an equally important message to bowlers, not that
boundaries were in short supply
as he hit nine in a fifty that
came from 93 deliveries. Dravid apart, none of India's
batsmen have shined whereas
each of the opposition have
played their part and here it
was Bell's turn to join the
double-hundred club, the first time England had made three in
a series since 1938. His 20th
boundary took him to his
milestone and celebrated with a
dismissive pull through midwicket.
He continued to have few problems as he eased along
against defensive fields until
missing an aggressive sweep
against Raina. Although the game had already
been taken well away from India,
Sreesanth at least bowled with a
bit more verve during the
morning session and showed the
passion that has been lacking from India's performances. When
Anderson jabbed to second slip
he was given a long stare by
Sreesanth and he also accounted
for Eoin Morgan who edged
behind for 1, playing away from his body which is still an area of
concern with Morgan's game at
Test level. At least Morgan's failure meant
Ravi Bopara didn't have to spend
another day watching his team-
mates pile on the runs even if
487 for 5 didn't exactly
represent a pressure situation. As at Edgbaston he looked
jittery, but the nerves were
settled a little as he clipped a
boundary to fine leg and cut the
medium-pace of RP Singh
through point. However, he should have been
run out on 38 when there was
confusion with Prior over a single
to backward point but the
throw from Sehwag to Amit
Mishra was poor. Mishra, meanwhile, continued to struggle
with figures of none for 170. A
poor piece of fielding and a set
of horror bowling figures were
two apt ways to sum up India's
series. It will take a huge effort to avoid 4-0 from here.

India are near to a whitewashIndia are near to a whitewash

India 103 for 5 (Dravid 57*, Dhoni
5*) trail England 591 for 6 dec
(Bell 235, Pietersen 175) by 488
runs The whitewash is well and truly
on. Despite another session being
lost to rain, and the best efforts
of Rahul Dravid, England surged
at The Oval as India were left in
tatters on 103 for 5 in reply to the hosts' massive 591 for 6. Ian
Bell carried his serene maiden
Test double to 235 then, after a
three-hour delay, Virender
Sehwag was removed in the first
over of India's reply and a succession of team-mates,
including Sachin Tendulkar,
followed him with Graeme Swann
making a major impression with
three wickets. England would probably have
carried on their run-glut
towards 650 - or even
consecutive scores of 700,
something that has never been
done - had the weather not closed in at lunch and, despite a
damp outfield, it was a fairly
straightforward decision for
Andrew Strauss to let his
bowlers loose during a long final
session. After a quiet time this is looking like Swann's match with
substantial turn already on offer
out of the footmarks. If he is the
matchwinner it really will be the
complete series for England. Having seen Swann's first ball
turn from RP Singh's
followthrough Tendulkar tried to
counter the threat by sweeping.
It took Swann a little time to
settle, but the sweep proved Tendulkar's downfall when he
gloved a chance over the
wicketkeeper's head and James
Anderson jogged round to hold
the catch. Suresh Raina was given a torrid
time by pace and spin and
couldn't open his account before
being brilliantly stumped by Matt
Prior for a 29-ball duck - the
joint longest by an India batsman - as Swann spun one sharply
past a lunging prod. The foot
was probably on the line, but it
was a brave decision from the
third umpire Steve Davis. To cap
Swann's best day of the series he had nightwatchman Ishant
Sharma caught at short leg two
overs before the close. India's problems were
compounded by Gautam Gambhir
suffering concussion following the
blow he took to the head while
dropping Kevin Pietersen on
Friday which meant India had to shuffle their line-up again.
However, even if Dravid had
remained at No. 3 he wouldn't
have had a long wait. There he
was at the close, defiant on 57,
with another mountain to climb. Sehwag at least avoided a third
golden duck after his king pair
at Edgbaston but didn't go much
further. After two sighters
outside off stump he played a
pair of trademark back-foot drives off Anderson who
responded with a delivery that
nipped back to trap Sehwag lbw
in front of middle and leg. It
meant the sum total of his series
was eight balls, eight runs and three dismissals while, for the
fourth time in the series, India
had lost a wicket in the opening
over. When it comes to changing India's
batting line-up Tendulkar never
shifts so it was VVS Laxman at
No. 3 where he hasn't been
comfortable during this series. He
received an excellent delivery from Stuart Broad that seamed
away to take the outside edge
as England's quicks extracted far
more life from the surface than
India's bowlers managed. And so,
for the seventh innings in a row, there was a standing ovation as
a batsman walked to the middle. Tendulkar didn't settle during his
innings, seemingly always
distracted by problems with the
sightscreen and troubled by the
pace bowlers. He ducked into a
bouncer from Broad (although responded with a flowing on-
drive), offered a return chance
to Tim Bresnan who couldn't hold
on with his left hand and was
very late on another delivery
from Bresnan that wasn't far from being lbw. For once, though,
it was spin not pace that ended
the latest attempt at 100
hundreds. Amid all this Dravid held firm. If
anything, he started his innings
with more positive intent than is
often the case. That meant
positive in defence, too, which
sends an equally important message to bowlers, not that
boundaries were in short supply
as he hit nine in a fifty that
came from 93 deliveries. Dravid apart, none of India's
batsmen have shined whereas
each of the opposition have
played their part and here it
was Bell's turn to join the
double-hundred club, the first time England had made three in
a series since 1938. His 20th
boundary took him to his
milestone and celebrated with a
dismissive pull through midwicket.
He continued to have few problems as he eased along
against defensive fields until
missing an aggressive sweep
against Raina. Although the game had already
been taken well away from India,
Sreesanth at least bowled with a
bit more verve during the
morning session and showed the
passion that has been lacking from India's performances. When
Anderson jabbed to second slip
he was given a long stare by
Sreesanth and he also accounted
for Eoin Morgan who edged
behind for 1, playing away from his body which is still an area of
concern with Morgan's game at
Test level. At least Morgan's failure meant
Ravi Bopara didn't have to spend
another day watching his team-
mates pile on the runs even if
487 for 5 didn't exactly
represent a pressure situation. As at Edgbaston he looked
jittery, but the nerves were
settled a little as he clipped a
boundary to fine leg and cut the
medium-pace of RP Singh
through point. However, he should have been
run out on 38 when there was
confusion with Prior over a single
to backward point but the
throw from Sehwag to Amit
Mishra was poor. Mishra, meanwhile, continued to struggle
with figures of none for 170. A
poor piece of fielding and a set
of horror bowling figures were
two apt ways to sum up India's
series. It will take a huge effort to avoid 4-0 from here.

Friday 19 August 2011

Bell and peterson flaten india

England 457 for 3 (Bell 181*,
Pietersen 175) v India To say England dominated at The
Oval doesn't really do their
performance justice. Ian Bell and
Kevin Pietersen, both with their
second hundreds of the series,
combined for a third-wicket stand of 350, England's second
highest third-wicket stand, as
the hosts plundered their way
to 457 for 3 with Bell unbeaten
on 181 to leave India facing a
three-day fight to avoid a whitewash. For the first session there was
actually a contest as England's
openers departed but India's
challenge evaporated after lunch
to such an extent that the
remaining 72 overs brought 331 runs. Bell's 16th Test century
was classical and elegant while
Pietersen thrilled with some of
his strokeplay in his 19th
hundred as the bowlers wilted.
Both batsmen had to earn the right to score freely by battling
through to lunch and ensured
they didn't waste the hard work. It became a head-to-head
between the pair for each of
the milestones. Bell was the first
to his fifty and hundreds, but
Pietersen, who went to his
hundred with a crunching pull off the first ball after tea, reached
150 ahead of his team-mate as
he unleashed his full array of
strokes during the final session
including a switch hit off Amit
Mishra. Bell, though, caught up with consecutive sixes off Mishra
in the final half an hour of the
day and will have a chance of his
maiden Test double on Saturday. Pietersen, who was dropped at
mid-on by Gautam Gambhir the
ball after reaching his hundred,
missed out on the chance of his
second double in the series when
he chipped a return catch to Suresh Raina for 175 shortly
before the close. The
partnership had moved past the
308 of Graham Gooch and Allan
Lamb at Lord's in 1990 and sits
behind the 370 added by Denis Compton and Bill Edrich against
South Africa, again at Lord's, in
1947. It was the latest example of the
hunger among the England
batsmen and if there were any
question marks over a loss of
intensity with the series secured
the ruthlessness of Bell and Pietersen showed how they have
refocused their minds. Again,
though, it has to be said that,
after the morning session, the
bowling was friendly and fielding
even worse. What a false dawn the early
exchanges proved to be. Ishant
Sharma struck with the fifth ball
of the day when Alastair Cook
was caught at first slip and
Andrew Strauss, who added just two to his overnight score from
32 deliveries, edged a loose drive
at Sreesanth to leave England
97 for 2. That was the highpoint
of India's day, and could even
prove the highpoint of their match. Ishant was excellent during his
first spell of 6-3-7-1 but, with
his extensive workload in this
series and in West Indies
beforehand, it was little surprise
he became less effective. RP Singh, meanwhile, just isn't
prepared for Test cricket and
Sreesanth huffed and puffed
without much impact. Mishra was
bowling round the wicket at
Pietersen's pads before tea and was given some harsh
treatment. The work of Bell and Pietersen
was the perfect example of
weathering a tough period and
cashing in later. Bell laid the
ground work following the early
dismissal of Cook and, after his innings at Edgbaston last week
which was a skittish affair, he
was back in full control in the
way he had been at Trent
Bridge during his 159. As in that innings third man was
a favourite area with India
refusing to plug the gap. They
preferred a man at deep point,
but Bell toyed with them as he
slotted boundaries either side of the sweeper. He continued to
churn out the runs with the
efficiency and style he has
shown during a season where his
Test average is well over 100. In
fitting style his hundred came with a sweetly-timed back-foot
drive off Raina having faced 181
deliveries with the second fifty
taking 71 balls. With the early
threat of Ishant nullified it
became an exercise in milking and retaining concentration -
Bell had no problem with either. Pietersen had dominated the
partnership early on, firstly while
the pair consolidated before the
lunch break and then when the
rate increased. The first 10
overs of the afternoon brought 59 runs and Pietersen took the
attack to Mishra. The contest
had started when Pietersen
cracked Mishra's first ball
through the off side and it was
clear he wasn't going to let the legspinner settle. Mishra's lack of
drift allowed Pietersen to target
the leg side and midwicket was a
profitable area. There was a nervous moment
for Pietersen when he was
nearly caught at leg slip, in very
similar fashion to the early
chance during his double hundred
at Lord's, as he flicked Ishant off the last ball before lunch but the
catch didn't quite carry. Unlike at
Lord's there was no
controversy, but it had been a
clever piece of thinking from
Ishant who'd noticed how far across the stumps Pietersen was
moving. However, India's fielding has been
largely shoddy during the series
and there were two examples in
consecutive balls with Pietersen
approaching his hundred. RP
Singh didn't appear fully committed to a catch at long-off
when Pietersen miscued a lofted
drive off Raina, then off the first
ball of the next over, he dived
over a ball at deep backward
square to gift another boundary. Gambhir's later drop added the
list of errors and, to top things
off for India, he was left dazed
after banging his head. The
scoreboard will have left him
dizzy, too.

Bell and Pietersen flatten India

England 457 for 3 (Bell 181*,
Pietersen 175) v India To say England dominated at The
Oval doesn't really do their
performance justice. Ian Bell and
Kevin Pietersen, both with their
second hundreds of the series,
combined for a third-wicket stand of 350, England's second
highest third-wicket stand, as
the hosts plundered their way
to 457 for 3 with Bell unbeaten
on 181 to leave India facing a
three-day fight to avoid a whitewash. For the first session there was
actually a contest as England's
openers departed but India's
challenge evaporated after lunch
to such an extent that the
remaining 72 overs brought 331 runs. Bell's 16th Test century
was classical and elegant while
Pietersen thrilled with some of
his strokeplay in his 19th
hundred as the bowlers wilted.
Both batsmen had to earn the right to score freely by battling
through to lunch and ensured
they didn't waste the hard work. It became a head-to-head
between the pair for each of
the milestones. Bell was the first
to his fifty and hundreds, but
Pietersen, who went to his
hundred with a crunching pull off the first ball after tea, reached
150 ahead of his team-mate as
he unleashed his full array of
strokes during the final session
including a switch hit off Amit
Mishra. Bell, though, caught up with consecutive sixes off Mishra
in the final half an hour of the
day and will have a chance of his
maiden Test double on Saturday. Pietersen, who was dropped at
mid-on by Gautam Gambhir the
ball after reaching his hundred,
missed out on the chance of his
second double in the series when
he chipped a return catch to Suresh Raina for 175 shortly
before the close. The
partnership had moved past the
308 of Graham Gooch and Allan
Lamb at Lord's in 1990 and sits
behind the 370 added by Denis Compton and Bill Edrich against
South Africa, again at Lord's, in
1947. It was the latest example of the
hunger among the England
batsmen and if there were any
question marks over a loss of
intensity with the series secured
the ruthlessness of Bell and Pietersen showed how they have
refocused their minds. Again,
though, it has to be said that,
after the morning session, the
bowling was friendly and fielding
even worse. What a false dawn the early
exchanges proved to be. Ishant
Sharma struck with the fifth ball
of the day when Alastair Cook
was caught at first slip and
Andrew Strauss, who added just two to his overnight score from
32 deliveries, edged a loose drive
at Sreesanth to leave England
97 for 2. That was the highpoint
of India's day, and could even
prove the highpoint of their match. Ishant was excellent during his
first spell of 6-3-7-1 but, with
his extensive workload in this
series and in West Indies
beforehand, it was little surprise
he became less effective. RP Singh, meanwhile, just isn't
prepared for Test cricket and
Sreesanth huffed and puffed
without much impact. Mishra was
bowling round the wicket at
Pietersen's pads before tea and was given some harsh
treatment. The work of Bell and Pietersen
was the perfect example of
weathering a tough period and
cashing in later. Bell laid the
ground work following the early
dismissal of Cook and, after his innings at Edgbaston last week
which was a skittish affair, he
was back in full control in the
way he had been at Trent
Bridge during his 159. As in that innings third man was
a favourite area with India
refusing to plug the gap. They
preferred a man at deep point,
but Bell toyed with them as he
slotted boundaries either side of the sweeper. He continued to
churn out the runs with the
efficiency and style he has
shown during a season where his
Test average is well over 100. In
fitting style his hundred came with a sweetly-timed back-foot
drive off Raina having faced 181
deliveries with the second fifty
taking 71 balls. With the early
threat of Ishant nullified it
became an exercise in milking and retaining concentration -
Bell had no problem with either. Pietersen had dominated the
partnership early on, firstly while
the pair consolidated before the
lunch break and then when the
rate increased. The first 10
overs of the afternoon brought 59 runs and Pietersen took the
attack to Mishra. The contest
had started when Pietersen
cracked Mishra's first ball
through the off side and it was
clear he wasn't going to let the legspinner settle. Mishra's lack of
drift allowed Pietersen to target
the leg side and midwicket was a
profitable area. There was a nervous moment
for Pietersen when he was
nearly caught at leg slip, in very
similar fashion to the early
chance during his double hundred
at Lord's, as he flicked Ishant off the last ball before lunch but the
catch didn't quite carry. Unlike at
Lord's there was no
controversy, but it had been a
clever piece of thinking from
Ishant who'd noticed how far across the stumps Pietersen was
moving. However, India's fielding has been
largely shoddy during the series
and there were two examples in
consecutive balls with Pietersen
approaching his hundred. RP
Singh didn't appear fully committed to a catch at long-off
when Pietersen miscued a lofted
drive off Raina, then off the first
ball of the next over, he dived
over a ball at deep backward
square to gift another boundary. Gambhir's later drop added the
list of errors and, to top things
off for India, he was left dazed
after banging his head. The
scoreboard will have left him
dizzy, too.England 457 for 3 (Bell 181*,
Pietersen 175) v India To say England dominated at The
Oval doesn't really do their
performance justice. Ian Bell and
Kevin Pietersen, both with their
second hundreds of the series,
combined for a third-wicket stand of 350, England's second
highest third-wicket stand, as
the hosts plundered their way
to 457 for 3 with Bell unbeaten
on 181 to leave India facing a
three-day fight to avoid a whitewash. For the first session there was
actually a contest as England's
openers departed but India's
challenge evaporated after lunch
to such an extent that the
remaining 72 overs brought 331 runs. Bell's 16th Test century
was classical and elegant while
Pietersen thrilled with some of
his strokeplay in his 19th
hundred as the bowlers wilted.
Both batsmen had to earn the right to score freely by battling
through to lunch and ensured
they didn't waste the hard work. It became a head-to-head
between the pair for each of
the milestones. Bell was the first
to his fifty and hundreds, but
Pietersen, who went to his
hundred with a crunching pull off the first ball after tea, reached
150 ahead of his team-mate as
he unleashed his full array of
strokes during the final session
including a switch hit off Amit
Mishra. Bell, though, caught up with consecutive sixes off Mishra
in the final half an hour of the
day and will have a chance of his
maiden Test double on Saturday. Pietersen, who was dropped at
mid-on by Gautam Gambhir the
ball after reaching his hundred,
missed out on the chance of his
second double in the series when
he chipped a return catch to Suresh Raina for 175 shortly
before the close. The
partnership had moved past the
308 of Graham Gooch and Allan
Lamb at Lord's in 1990 and sits
behind the 370 added by Denis Compton and Bill Edrich against
South Africa, again at Lord's, in
1947. It was the latest example of the
hunger among the England
batsmen and if there were any
question marks over a loss of
intensity with the series secured
the ruthlessness of Bell and Pietersen showed how they have
refocused their minds. Again,
though, it has to be said that,
after the morning session, the
bowling was friendly and fielding
even worse. What a false dawn the early
exchanges proved to be. Ishant
Sharma struck with the fifth ball
of the day when Alastair Cook
was caught at first slip and
Andrew Strauss, who added just two to his overnight score from
32 deliveries, edged a loose drive
at Sreesanth to leave England
97 for 2. That was the highpoint
of India's day, and could even
prove the highpoint of their match. Ishant was excellent during his
first spell of 6-3-7-1 but, with
his extensive workload in this
series and in West Indies
beforehand, it was little surprise
he became less effective. RP Singh, meanwhile, just isn't
prepared for Test cricket and
Sreesanth huffed and puffed
without much impact. Mishra was
bowling round the wicket at
Pietersen's pads before tea and was given some harsh
treatment. The work of Bell and Pietersen
was the perfect example of
weathering a tough period and
cashing in later. Bell laid the
ground work following the early
dismissal of Cook and, after his innings at Edgbaston last week
which was a skittish affair, he
was back in full control in the
way he had been at Trent
Bridge during his 159. As in that innings third man was
a favourite area with India
refusing to plug the gap. They
preferred a man at deep point,
but Bell toyed with them as he
slotted boundaries either side of the sweeper. He continued to
churn out the runs with the
efficiency and style he has
shown during a season where his
Test average is well over 100. In
fitting style his hundred came with a sweetly-timed back-foot
drive off Raina having faced 181
deliveries with the second fifty
taking 71 balls. With the early
threat of Ishant nullified it
became an exercise in milking and retaining concentration -
Bell had no problem with either. Pietersen had dominated the
partnership early on, firstly while
the pair consolidated before the
lunch break and then when the
rate increased. The first 10
overs of the afternoon brought 59 runs and Pietersen took the
attack to Mishra. The contest
had started when Pietersen
cracked Mishra's first ball
through the off side and it was
clear he wasn't going to let the legspinner settle. Mishra's lack of
drift allowed Pietersen to target
the leg side and midwicket was a
profitable area. There was a nervous moment
for Pietersen when he was
nearly caught at leg slip, in very
similar fashion to the early
chance during his double hundred
at Lord's, as he flicked Ishant off the last ball before lunch but the
catch didn't quite carry. Unlike at
Lord's there was no
controversy, but it had been a
clever piece of thinking from
Ishant who'd noticed how far across the stumps Pietersen was
moving. However, India's fielding has been
largely shoddy during the series
and there were two examples in
consecutive balls with Pietersen
approaching his hundred. RP
Singh didn't appear fully committed to a catch at long-off
when Pietersen miscued a lofted
drive off Raina, then off the first
ball of the next over, he dived
over a ball at deep backward
square to gift another boundary. Gambhir's later drop added the
list of errors and, to top things
off for India, he was left dazed
after banging his head. The
scoreboard will have left him
dizzy, too.














































































































































Sunday 7 August 2011

I went from hero to zero - Afridi

Former Pakistan captain Shahid
Afridi has claimed that he was
not part of the selection
meetings for the final two one-
dayers against West Indies in
May earlier this year, despite being captain. A series of sharp
comments made to the Pakistani
media over the past couple of
days seems to dispel any
possibility of a reconciliation -
speculation about which increased following the death of
his father last month - with the
cricket establishment. On his return from the
Caribbean, Afridi hinted at
differences with coach Waqar
Younis that sparked off a
controversy leading to Afridi's
removal as limited-overs captain and a legal battle with the
Pakistan board. Waqar's tour report of that
series confirmed Afridi had
walked out of a meeting over
differences relating to selection.
Pakistan lost the final two ODIs
and PCB chief Ijaz Butt defended the decision to remove Afridi
saying he wasn't "captaincy
material" in an interview last
month. "I did not take part in the
selection meeting on the eve of
the last two matches," Afridi told
reporters in Karachi on Monday.
"The team was selected by coach
Waqar Younis and Intikhab Alam and I had no input in the
selection of the playing eleven. "Everybody knows through the
manager's report that I wasn't
involved in selection because I
walked away from the meeting.
The chairman's comments were
really disappointing because the remarks he made don't suit his
stature. I was a hero for them
after the World Cup and
suddenly I became zero." Afridi said his dispute with the
PCB, which ended when he
agreed to plead guilty of
misconduct and paid a fine of 4.5
million rupees in exchange for
permission to play domestic Twenty20 cricket in England,
affected the team's momentum.
"I made many plans for the
team," Afridi said. "Misbah-ul-Haq,
Mohammad Hafeez and myself
were involved in devising many strategies but it was ruined
because of what happened
afterwards." Afridi, who retired "conditionally"
from international cricket after
his removal as captain, said he
would not go back on his decision
as long as the present regime of
the PCB remained in power. "I cannot play with people who
conspired against me and
worked against the team, they
have their personal interests
paramount to them and they
are only damaging the team. "I have always maintained that
playing for Pakistan is my
priority, I would always prefer
representing my country over
any offer from anywhere in the
world," he said.
Http://m.espncricinfo.com/s/5643/60?countryId=7&country=pakistan&itemTitle=I%20went%20from%20hero%20to%20zero%20-%20Afridi&storyNo=525675&allinOne=true

Saturday 6 August 2011

Dravid will retire after England ODI

Rahul Dravid has announced his
retirement from international
limited-overs cricket following
the England series. In his
announcement, which came hours
after he was handed a shock recall to the one-day side for
that tour, he said he wanted to
retire from the shorter forms
and concentrate on Test cricket. Dravid, 38, is the seventh
highest run-getter in ODIs, with
10,765 runs in 339 matches,
averaging just under 40. He
hasn't been a regular in the
Indian one-day side since late 2007 - a couple of months after
he reached his career-high ICC
ranking of No. 5 - though he
made a brief comeback during
the 2009 Champions Trophy in
South Africa. He admitted he hadn't expected a recall for the
upcoming England series. "Since I had not been picked for
one-day cricket for the last two
years, I was obviously a little
surprised," he said after India's
tour match against
Northamptonshire. "To be honest, because I had not been
picked, I had not informed the
selectors or the board of my
desire to solely focus on Test
cricket. "At the end of this one-day
series, I would like to announce
my retirement from one-day and
Twenty20 cricket and
concentrate only on Test cricket.
I am committed, as always to give my best to India in this one-
day series and obviously the
Test series that follows. "In the short term I am
committed because now I have
been picked for the series, but
in the long term I think it is best
for me and Indian cricket that I
focus on Test cricket." Dravid recently became the
second highest run-getter in
Tests, and has had a resurgence
in form over the past couple of
months, scoring three centuries
in five Tests to end a relatively lean run in the last few years. When he started his
international career in 1996, he
was seen as a batsman more
suited to the longer form but he
soon adapted to the challenges
of one-day cricket. Among the highlights of his ODI career was
the 1999 World Cup, where he
was the top scorer and put on
the then largest partnership in a
one-dayer, 318 with Sourav
Ganguly. Six months later he bettered that with a 331-run
stand with Sachin Tendulkar that
is still the biggest in the format. As in his Test career, he
routinely fitted into roles the
team needed him to, notably in
the 2003 World Cup, where in
order to accommodate an extra
batsman in the side, he took over the wicketkeeping duties.
One of the lows of his career
was the 2007 World Cup, when
under his leadership, India
crashed out in the first round.
Http://m.espncricinfo.com/s/5643/49?countryId=6&country=topNews&itemTitle=Dravid%20will%20quit%20ODIs%20after%20England&storyNo=526175&allinOne=true
Http://m.espncricinfo.com/s/5643/49?countryId=6&country=topNews&itemTitle=Dravid%20will%20quit%20ODIs%20after%20England&storyNo=526175&allinOne=true